Portals
suck December 22, 2019 -- In 2013, I blogged/griped about "patient portals". In the years since then, they have gotten a little better... not a lot. Why not? Because their design continues to be driven by financial not quality-of-care motives. It is not only me griping. See, for example, Meaningful Use of Health Information Is Meaningless For Patients (Chuck Dinerstein, 12/11/19, American Council on Science and Health, "Promoting science and debunking junk since 1978"): only 10% of patients use this access. Why so few? Patient portals (of which Epic's MyChart is among the best), serve the interests of the health care institution (HCI) not of the patient. They do offer features that patients like, such as:
There are plenty of other features that could be added to portals that patients would like. But it doesn't matter what patients would like. If a feature doesn't redound to the bottom line, it is not provided. Examples:
We'll get these things (if ever we do) only through legislation. Which is today being weakened not strengthened. So I still contend that portals suck. |
|